| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. my dream ship. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
KFenn wrote: Malcorath Sacerdos wrote: Why are there no sub cap ships who specialice in using drones alone ? i would like to fly a ship wich only uses drones for offence ( not much into either lauchers or turrents ) and still has comparable...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.12.13 15:28:00
|
162. my dream ship. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Why are there no sub cap ships who specialice in using drones alone ? i would like to fly a ship wich only uses drones for offence ( not much into either lauchers or turrents ) and still has comparable damage output to other conventional ships hi...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.12.13 12:32:00
|
163. Fix the damage multipliers on drones. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
i would like to see a ship that is focused on drone use the the exclusion of launchers and turrents. But not being a capital ship. on topic tho. i would like to know too if the drones are intended like that or if it is an oversight.
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.12.13 09:42:00
|
164. [Proposal] Get rid of learning implants. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
@ op hmm intresting .. i completly agree +1 m8
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.12.12 08:24:00
|
165. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Jack Miton wrote: look, like i said on your BC post, your fit is fine for kspace but it has no place in WHs. there are MANY subcap ships that are better (much better) at killing sleepers and for pvp, it needs to be propper triage fit. as someo...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.19 12:24:00
|
166. Quick Customs Office Confirmation Question - in Science and Industry [original thread]
as a wh pi person i think this is wonderfull . 1. it will make the wh corps boost their numbers to defend the pi investments moar ppl in the wh easier to raid nb-¦s and collapse spent wh-¦s . 2. 0 tax for my pi ( the corp can take the isk out i...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.19 10:13:00
|
167. [Proposal] Name Changing - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Smiling Menace wrote: I really don't agree with transferring characters at all so I really don't like the idea of changing names on a whim either. I don't think it's that big an issue with the vast majority of players and I would rather CCP sp...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.19 09:26:00
|
168. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Haniblecter Teg wrote: Well if you're going to solo some crap, then you're going to need some target painters in mid. Find they're very useful for some small crap (if its just you and your salvager) thank you i will take that into consideration
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.19 09:14:00
|
169. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Jovan Geldon wrote: Malcorath Sacerdos wrote: Capital escalation is caused when you warp certain types of capital ships into a site. Capital escalation appears to be tied to two, and only two, classes of capitals (it should be obvious which ...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.18 05:19:00
|
170. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Windorian wrote: I actually use a Thanatos in a C4, so i can give some real-life (eve-life) advice, not just forums quotes. My thanatos: High: 2 Cap armor transfer, 1 cap energy transfer, 1 adv drone link (extra fighter) and 2 faction smartbo...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.18 05:18:00
|
171. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
is there a non out of date guide. ? any hard fact about it ? would like to verify the info ( no insult intended )
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.17 17:18:00
|
172. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Capital escalation is caused when you warp certain types of capital ships into a site. Capital escalation appears to be tied to two, and only two, classes of capitals (it should be obvious which two), with each having their own escalation chain. F...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.17 17:12:00
|
173. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Mart Allini wrote: Malcorath Sacerdos wrote: Mart Allini wrote: As a general rule in Eve, trying a fit a ship to do everything will make it do everything poorly so I wouldn't recommend it. Out of the list of things you want to do it, only...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.17 11:10:00
|
174. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Mart Allini wrote: As a general rule in Eve, trying a fit a ship to do everything will make it do everything poorly so I wouldn't recommend it. Out of the list of things you want to do it, only the first and the last are a remotely good use for...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.17 10:33:00
|
175. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Aamrr wrote: It looks like something out of 2005. I can't help but think that an Archon would do the job better. That said, this should be using meta-4 energy neutralizers, not storyline. But people already told you that here . just notise...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.17 10:28:00
|
176. WH Carrier´s - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
how would you fit a multi purpose carrier in a c4 ( no way for a carrier to leave system and no chance of having enemy caps jump in on you this is my thinking [Thanatos, WH thanatos 1] Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Arm...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.17 09:43:00
|
177. Suggested Incarna features - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: I wrote this at the General Discussion, but all in all i would like to know what people haves to say about it in order to forward some proposal to the CSM and thus to CCP and eventually CCP Solomon and his team. What...
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.15 21:14:00
|
178. [Proposal] Static Signatures - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
yes pls +1 and great idea !
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.15 20:59:00
|
179. Moons in wormhole - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
moon goo naa .. no need ice .. yes plz
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.15 20:55:00
|
180. [Proposal] Name Changing - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
i support name change op has good arguments
- by Malcorath Sacerdos - at 2011.10.15 20:12:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |